
GeForce 6800

Quadro FX 560
GeForce 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6800 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6800
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌19700% longer card at 198mm vs 1mm.
Quadro FX 560
2008Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 198mm, a 197mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6800
The GeForce 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points.

Quadro FX 560
The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6800 scores 113 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 6800) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 6800) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 114 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 256+7% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6800 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6800) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 198mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-83% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4+467% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6800 came in at $299, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6800) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the Quadro FX 560 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6800 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | July 22 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #832 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














