
GeForce 6800

Radeon HD 6290
GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6800
2014Why buy it
- β 43.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Draws 33W instead of 375W, a 342W reduction.
- β More future proof: Maxwell (2014β2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β498% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6290
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Delivers 455.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1036.4% higher power demand at 375W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6800
The GeForce 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points.

Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 Γ2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6800 scores 113 versus the Radeon HD 6290's 105 β the GeForce 6800 leads by 7.6%. The GeForce 6800 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 6800) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 6800) vs 2.55 TFLOPS Γ2 (Radeon HD 6290).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113+8% | 105 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536 Γ2+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS Γ2+333% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 Γ2+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96 Γ2+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6290 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6800 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6800) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290) β the GeForce 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2+24% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4+110% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 6800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | β |
| Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W β a 167.6% difference. The GeForce 6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-91% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 198mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65Β°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4+1033% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6800 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6290 was 83.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6800) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) β the Radeon HD 6290 offers 425% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6800 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $50-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 2.1+425% |
| Codename | GM108 | Antilles |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #832 | #583 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














