GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290

NVIDIA

GeForce 6800

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6290

2011Core: 830 MHz

GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6800

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…43.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Draws 33W instead of 375W, a 342W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    498% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 455.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1036.4% higher power demand at 375W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 6800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.6% in PassMark G3D (113 vs 105), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 6800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 455.7% (2.1 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 6800 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6800 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6800

The GeForce 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6800 scores 113 versus the Radeon HD 6290's 105 β€” the GeForce 6800 leads by 7.6%. The GeForce 6800 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 6800) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 6800) vs 2.55 TFLOPS Γ—2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score
113+8%
105
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
1536 Γ—2+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
2.55 TFLOPS Γ—2+333%
ROPs
8
32 Γ—2+300%
TMUs
16
96 Γ—2+500%
L1 Cache
128 KB
384 KB+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6290 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6800 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6800) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290) β€” the GeForce 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
DirectX
9.0c
11.2+24%
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 6800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
Encoder
None
β€”
Decoder
PureVideo (VP1)
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6800 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W β€” a 167.6% difference. The GeForce 6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65Β°C.

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
TDP
33W-91%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
198mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
80
65Β°C-19%
Perf/Watt
3.4+1033%
0.3
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6800 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6290 was 83.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6800) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) β€” the Radeon HD 6290 offers 425% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6800 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 6800Radeon HD 6290
MSRP
$299
$50-83%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
2.1+425%
Codename
GM108
Antilles
Release
July 22 2014
March 8 2011
Ranking
#832
#583

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.