CPU
GPU
GeForce 7300 GT
Popular choices:
GeForce 310M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7300 GT is positioned at rank 326 and the GeForce 310M is on rank 613, so the GeForce 7300 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7300 GT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 310M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 7300 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce 7300 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 310M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 310M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7300 GT.
| Insight | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 310M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7300 GT and GeForce 310M
GeForce 7300 GT
The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce 310M
The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7300 GT scores 124 and the GeForce 310M reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7300 GT is built on Ampere while the GeForce 310M uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 384 (GeForce 310M). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 310M). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 549 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 127+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+2700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+9388% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz+239% | 549 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+1300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 336+1300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+5426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7300 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 310M has 512 MB. The GeForce 310M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 1 MB (GeForce 310M) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 10.1 (GeForce 310M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1+12% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7300 GT) vs None (GeForce 310M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M).
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7300 GT draws 450W versus the GeForce 310M's 33W — a 172.7% difference. The GeForce 310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 350W (GeForce 310M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 33W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.8+1167% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7300 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 310M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | GM108 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #19 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 7300 GT and GeForce 310M
