CPU
GPU
GeForce 7300 GT
Popular choices:
GeForce 9200M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7300 GT is positioned at rank 326 and the GeForce 9200M GS is on rank 683, so the GeForce 7300 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7300 GT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 7300 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The GeForce 7300 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9200M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9200M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7300 GT.
| Insight | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7300 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $40 for the GeForce 9200M GS, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 92.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7300 GT and GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 7300 GT
The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7300 GT scores 124 and the GeForce 9200M GS reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7300 GT is built on Ampere while the GeForce 9200M GS uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GS). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 129+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+4100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+7768% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz+87% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+1300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 336+1300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+7977% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7300 GT) vs No (GeForce 9200M GS). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GS).
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7300 GT draws 450W versus the GeForce 9200M GS's 16W — a 186.3% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 16W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 8.1+2600% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7300 GT launched at $89 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9200M GS launched at $100 and now averages $40. The GeForce 7300 GT costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 3.2 (GeForce 9200M GS) — the GeForce 7300 GT offers 93.8% better value. The GeForce 7300 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 7300 GT | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-11% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2+94% | 3.2 |
| Codename | GA102 | GM108 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #19 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 7300 GT and GeForce 9200M GS
