GeForce 8300 GS vs Quadro FX 560
GeForce 8300 GS
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8300 GS is positioned at rank 625 and the Quadro FX 560 is on rank 390, so the Quadro FX 560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300 GS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 560
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 8300 GS is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce 8300 GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8300 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 560.
| Insight | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 230.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+230.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8300 GS and Quadro FX 560
GeForce 8300 GS
The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.
Quadro FX 560
The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8300 GS scores 115 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8300 GS is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115 | 114 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 256+7% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8300 GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB. The GeForce 8300 GS offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce 8300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8300 GS draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-83% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 1mm |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5+483% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8300 GS launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299 and now averages $15. The Quadro FX 560 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 7.6 (Quadro FX 560) — the Quadro FX 560 offers 230.4% better value. The GeForce 8300 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-83% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 7.6+230% |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | July 22 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #832 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8300 GS and Quadro FX 560
