GeForce 8300 GS
VS
Radeon HD 6310

GeForce 8300 GS vs Radeon HD 6310

NVIDIA

GeForce 8300 GS

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6310

2011Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8300 GS is positioned at rank 625 and the Radeon HD 6310 is on rank 300, so the Radeon HD 6310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300 GS

#615
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4720%
#617
4279%
#618
4268%
#622
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3881%
#623
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3854%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#626
99%
#627
98%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
97%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
93%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
92%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
92%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
91%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
91%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#638
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
90%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
89%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6310

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2973%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2856%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2823%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2818%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2812%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2796%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2761%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2751%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2725%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2718%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2685%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2680%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2631%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2630%
#285
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3279%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
98%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
98%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
97%
#304
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
93%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
92%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#311
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
89%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
86%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
81%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8300 GS.

InsightGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%)
Leading raw performance (+6.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 6.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+6.1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8300 GS and Radeon HD 6310

NVIDIA

GeForce 8300 GS

The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8300 GS scores 115 versus the Radeon HD 6310's 122 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce 8300 GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

FeatureGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score
115
122+6%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
1280+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+226%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
16
80+400%
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce 8300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8300 GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
TDP
33W-82%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
170mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.5+400%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8300 GS launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 4.3% better value. The GeForce 8300 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 8300 GSRadeon HD 6310
MSRP
$50
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
2.3
2.4+4%
Codename
GM108
Cayman
Release
July 22 2014
December 1 2011
Ranking
#832
#598