
GeForce 8300 GS

Radeon HD 2400 XT
GeForce 8300 GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8300 GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8300 GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8300 GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 185W, a 152W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 2400 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 2400 XT
2012Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌58% HIGHER MSRP$79 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌460.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8300 GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8300 GS
The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

Radeon HD 2400 XT
The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8300 GS scores 115 and the Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8300 GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2400 XT uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115 | 119+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 2.995 TFLOPS+409% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+18% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8300 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2400 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8300 GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce 8300 GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8300 GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce 8300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8300 GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2400 XT's 185W — a 139.4% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5+483% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8300 GS came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $79. On MSRP, GeForce 8300 GS was 36.7% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce 8300 GS offers 53.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8300 GS (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-37% | $79 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+53% | 1.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | July 22 2014 | November 19 2012 |
| Ranking | #832 | #469 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














