
GeForce 830A vs FirePro M4170

GeForce 830A
Popular choices:

FirePro M4170
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 830A is positioned at rank 344 and the FirePro M4170 is on rank 196, so the FirePro M4170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 830A
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4170
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 830A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4170 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 830A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 830A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 167.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+167.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 830A and FirePro M4170

GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the FirePro M4170 reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the FirePro M4170 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 384 (FirePro M4170). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,173 | 1,168 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+28% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 830A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4170 has 4 GB. The FirePro M4170 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A) vs 12 (FirePro M4170). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170). Decoder: VP6 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP6 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the FirePro M4170's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 350W (FirePro M4170). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5+355% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 830A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro M4170 launched at $200 and now averages $80. The GeForce 830A costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.1 (GeForce 830A) vs 14.6 (FirePro M4170) — the GeForce 830A offers 167.8% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-63% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.1+168% | 14.6 |
| Codename | GM108 | Opal |
| Release | July 22 2014 | April 23 2015 |
| Ranking | #832 | #838 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















