GeForce 830M
Radeon R7 M260X
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 M260X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 830M
2014Why buy it
- ✅43.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 M260X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 830M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 830M
The GeForce 830M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points.
Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 830M scores 1,005 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,005 | 1,013 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS+7% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+61% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 830M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M260X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 830M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260X) — the GeForce 830M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 830M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-2 (GeForce 830M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X).
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 830M draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 830M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5+126% | 13.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 830M | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $139 |
| Codename | GM108 | Opal |
| Release | March 12 2014 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #885 | #878 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 830M and Radeon R7 M260X
