FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 830M

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

GeForce 830M

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V4900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,009 vs 1,005), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 830M

The GeForce 830M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the GeForce 830M reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 830M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 256 (GeForce 830M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830M).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,005
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+88%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+30%
0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+50%
16
L1 Cache
48 KB
128 KB+167%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 830M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V4900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830M carries 2 GB. GeForce 830M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the GeForce 830M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V4900) vs 1 MB (GeForce 830M) — the GeForce 830M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830M). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
DirectX
11
12 (11_0)+9%
Vulkan
None
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 830M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2 (GeForce 830M).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 3.1
PureVideo HD (VP6)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the GeForce 830M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 830M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (GeForce 830M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 163mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
163mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
13.5
30.5+126%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 830M (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 830M
MSRP
$200
Codename
Turks
GM108
Release
November 1 2011
March 12 2014
Ranking
#882
#885

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.