
FirePro V4900

GeForce 830M
FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V4900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
GeForce 830M
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 830M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

GeForce 830M
The GeForce 830M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the GeForce 830M reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 830M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 256 (GeForce 830M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830M).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 1,005 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+88% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+30% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 830M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V4900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830M carries 2 GB. GeForce 830M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the GeForce 830M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V4900) vs 1 MB (GeForce 830M) — the GeForce 830M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830M). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 830M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2 (GeForce 830M).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the GeForce 830M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 830M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (GeForce 830M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 163mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 163mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 30.5+126% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 830M (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Codename | Turks | GM108 |
| Release | November 1 2011 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #882 | #885 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















