FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 930M

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 930M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 930M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

GeForce 930M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 930M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,011 vs 1,009), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 930M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 930M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the GeForce 930M reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 930M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 384 (GeForce 930M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 930M).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,011
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+82%
0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
48 KB
192 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V4900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930M carries 512 MB. FirePro V4900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the GeForce 930M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V4900) vs 1 MB (GeForce 930M) — the GeForce 930M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 11.0 (GeForce 930M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
DirectX
11
11.0
Vulkan
None
1.2
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 930M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 930M).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 2.0
Decoder
UVD 3.1
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the GeForce 930M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 930M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (GeForce 930M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 163mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
163mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
13.5
30.6+127%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 930M (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V4900GeForce 930M
MSRP
$200
Codename
Turks
GM108
Release
November 1 2011
March 13 2015
Ranking
#882
#880

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.