FirePro V4900 vs Radeon HD 6750

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

  • Measures 163mm instead of 170mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 83.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $91 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 90.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,046 vs 1,009), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 90.2% (9.6 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V4900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750).

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,046+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480
720+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
48 KB
72 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
DirectX
11
11.2 (11_0)+2%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 13.7% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 163mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
TDP
75W-13%
86W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
163mm
170mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
13.5+11%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6750 was 45.5% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the Radeon HD 6750 offers 92% better value.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon HD 6750
MSRP
$200
$109-46%
Performance per Dollar
5.0
9.6+92%
Codename
Turks
Juniper
Release
November 1 2011
January 21 2011
Ranking
#882
#872

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.