CPU
GPU
FirePro V4900
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V4900 is positioned at rank 212 and the Radeon HD 6750 is on rank 133, so the Radeon HD 6750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V4900
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V4900.
| Insight | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V4900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V4900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $47 (vs $109), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 123.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+123.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($47) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V4900 and Radeon HD 6750
FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 1,046+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 720+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 36+50% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 72 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0)+2% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 13.7% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 163mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-13% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 163mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+11% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V4900 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $47, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The FirePro V4900 costs 56.9% less ($62 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (FirePro V4900) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the FirePro V4900 offers 124% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $109-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $47-57% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+124% | 9.6 |
| Codename | Turks | Juniper |
| Release | November 1 2011 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #882 | #872 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V4900 and Radeon HD 6750
