FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4800

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,599 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 803.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 799.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,799 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V4900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,009 vs 1,005), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,599 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 803.1% (5.0 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Quadro FX 4800 reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 4800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4800). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800).

FeatureFirePro V4900Quadro FX 4800
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,005
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+66%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V4900Quadro FX 4800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4800 carries 2 GB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V4900) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) — the FirePro V4900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V4900Quadro FX 4800
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1.5 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 4800's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro V4900Quadro FX 4800
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
163mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
13.5+101%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799. On MSRP, FirePro V4900 was 88.9% cheaper ($1599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) — the FirePro V4900 offers 733.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V4900 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro V4900Quadro FX 4800
MSRP
$200-89%
$1799
Performance per Dollar
5.0+733%
0.6
Codename
Turks
GT200B
Release
November 1 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#882
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.