
FirePro V4900

Quadro FX 4800
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V4900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,599 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 803.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 4800
2008Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌799.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,799 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro FX 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Quadro FX 4800
The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Quadro FX 4800 reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 4800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4800). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 1,005 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+150% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+66% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4800 carries 2 GB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V4900) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) — the FirePro V4900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1.5 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 4800's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 163mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+101% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799. On MSRP, FirePro V4900 was 88.9% cheaper ($1599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) — the FirePro V4900 offers 733.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V4900 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-89% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+733% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Turks | GT200B |
| Release | November 1 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #882 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















