FirePro V4900 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
FirePro V4900
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V4900 is positioned at rank #212 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V4900
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V4900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V4900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V4900 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 1,041+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 480+150% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+100% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The FirePro V4900 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 163mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 69.4+414% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V4900 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $47, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($47 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (FirePro V4900) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $47 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Turks | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | November 1 2011 | September 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #882 | #875 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V4900 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
