FirePro V4900
Quadro K2000M
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V4900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Quadro K2000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Quadro K2000M
The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Quadro K2000M reaches 1,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro K2000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 384 (Quadro K2000M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 1,004 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+34% | 0.5722 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB+50% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K2000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000M.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 11.1 (11_0) (Quadro K2000M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs NVENC (Quadro K2000M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Quadro K2000M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro K2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Quadro K2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 163mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 18.3+36% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro K2000M (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Codename | Turks | GK107 |
| Release | November 1 2011 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #882 | #886 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M
