FirePro V4900 vs GeForce RTX 3070
FirePro V4900
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V4900 is positioned at rank #212 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V4900
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V4900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2097.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V4900.
| Insight | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2097.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2097.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $47), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 416.4% better value per dollar than the FirePro V4900.
| Insight | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+416.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($47) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V4900 and GeForce RTX 3070
FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2097.4%. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009 | 22,172+2097% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 5888+1127% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+2545% |
| ROPs | 8 | 96+1100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 184+667% |
| L1 Cache | 0.05 MB | 5.8 MB+11500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V4900) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 163mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 163mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 100.8+647% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V4900 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $47, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The FirePro V4900 costs 76.5% less ($153 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (FirePro V4900) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 415.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-60% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $47-77% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 110.9+416% |
| Codename | Turks | GA104 |
| Release | November 1 2011 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #882 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V4900 and GeForce RTX 3070
