FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
308.2% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
❌16200% longer card at 163mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 314.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 163mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 A375 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,024 vs 1,009), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 314.2% (20.9 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V4900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375).

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,009	1,024+1%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480	640+33%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 carries 512 MB. FirePro V4900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	11	12_0+9%
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3.1	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 163mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	163mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	13.5	34.1+153%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R9 A375 was 75.5% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 318% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 A375 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$200	$49-76%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	20.9+318%
Codename	Turks	Venus
Release	November 1 2011	2015
Ranking	#882	#877

Search FirePro V4900 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.