GeForce 830M vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 830M vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 830M vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 830M

2014

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 830M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 830M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 A375 instead at 1,024 vs 1,005, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 830M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 830M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 830M vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 830M

The GeForce 830M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 830M scores 1,005 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,005	1,024+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	640+150%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+24%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 830M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 A375 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 830M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 carries 512 MB. GeForce 830M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 830M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	NVENC (Maxwell)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP6)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 830M draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	33W	30W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	30.5	34.1+12%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 A375 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce 830M	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GM108	Venus
Release	March 12 2014	2015
Ranking	#885	#877

Search GeForce 830M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.