GeForce 8400 vs GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce 8400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 8400 is positioned at rank #657 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12324.7% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12324.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+12324.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $60), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 935.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+935.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 and GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce 8400
The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 scores 81 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 12324.7%. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81 | 10,064+12325% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+928% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1733 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 160+900% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 960 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12+20% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 138% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 173mm |
| Height | 106mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5 | 55.9+2136% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400 launched at $45 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce 8400 costs 91.7% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.2 (GeForce 8400) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 935.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-82% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-92% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.2 | 167.7+935% |
| Codename | GM108 | GP104 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #850 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400 and GeForce GTX 1060
