GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro FX 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro FX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro FX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400M GS

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4428.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4000

2008

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
4298% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8400M GS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (104 vs 101), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400M GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4428.6% (2.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro FX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M GS

The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M GS scores 104 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GS is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).

Feature	GeForce 8400M GS	Quadro FX 4000
G3D Mark Score	104+3%	101
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+87%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	24+200%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GS	Quadro FX 4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400M GS has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4000 carries 256 MB. Quadro FX 4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GS and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 8400M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GS	Quadro FX 4000
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M GS draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GS	Quadro FX 4000
TDP	33W-78%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.2+357%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400M GS came in at $50, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GS was 97.7% cheaper ($2149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 8400M GS offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400M GS (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8400M GS	Quadro FX 4000
MSRP	$50-98%	$2199
Performance per Dollar	2.1	0.0
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 12 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#854	#884

Search GeForce 8400M GS on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.