GeForce 8800M GTX vs FirePro 3D V3800
GeForce 8800M GTX
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800M GTX is positioned at rank 378 and the FirePro 3D V3800 is on rank 238, so the FirePro 3D V3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800M GTX
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800M GTX.
| Insight | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V3800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800M GTX and FirePro 3D V3800
GeForce 8800M GTX
The GeForce 8800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 462 points.
FirePro 3D V3800
The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800M GTX scores 462 and the FirePro 3D V3800 reaches 472 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTX is built on G9x while the FirePro 3D V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 462 | 472+2% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 800+257% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800M GTX draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V3800's 74W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 74W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 64mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 65°C-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 6.4+106% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $12 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Juniper |
| Release | July 15 2008 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #825 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8800M GTX and FirePro 3D V3800
