GeForce 9100M G vs GeForce 9300 SE

GeForce 9100M G

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

GeForce 9300 SE

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

+1.2%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9100M G is positioned at rank 598 and the GeForce 9300 SE is on rank 668, so the GeForce 9100M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9100M G

#588

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3919%

#590

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3553%

#591

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3544%

#595

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3222%

#596

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3200%

#598

GeForce 9100M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

100%

#599

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#600

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#601

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#602

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#603

Mobility Radeon HD 5870

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

99%

#604

Radeon R7 M260DX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

98%

#605

Radeon HD 8610G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#606

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $60

94%

#607

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

94%

#608

GeForce 9800M GS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

94%

#609

Radeon R7 M270

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

93%

#610

GeForce 9800 GTX

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

93%

#611

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

92%

#612

Mobility Radeon HD 5850

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE

#656

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

6620%

#658

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

6001%

#659

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5985%

#663

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

5443%

#664

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

5405%

#666

GeForce 9700M GT

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

100%

#667

Mobility Radeon X2500

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

100%

#668

GeForce 9300 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#669

GeForce 9800M GTX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $30

92%

#670

Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $57

92%

#671

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

91%

#672

GeForce 505

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

88%

#673

GeForce 9200M GE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

88%

#674

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

87%

#675

Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $40

87%

#676

GeForce 7500 LE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

87%

#677

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

84%

#678

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

83%

#679

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

83%

#680

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

82%

#681

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9100M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300 SE.

Insight	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9100M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9100M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 9100M G Benchmark Check

GeForce 9300 SE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9100M G and GeForce 9300 SE

GeForce 9100M G

The GeForce 9100M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

GeForce 9300 SE

The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9100M G scores 83 and the GeForce 9300 SE reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9100M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300 SE uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 SE). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9100M G) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 941 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
G3D Mark Score	83+1%	82
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+25%	0.7227 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1176 MHz+25%	941 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9100M G) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	2.1	3.3+57%
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9100M G) vs None (GeForce 9300 SE). Decoder: PureVideo VP3 vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 9100M G) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300 SE).

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo VP3	PureVideo HD (VP3)
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9100M G draws 33W versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9300 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9100M G) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce 9100M G	GeForce 9300 SE
TDP	33W	33W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	80
Perf/Watt	2.5	2.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9100M G launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.3 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9100M G offers 1.2% better value.