GeForce 9100M G
VS
Radeon HD 3200

GeForce 9100M G vs Radeon HD 3200

NVIDIA

GeForce 9100M G

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3200

2011Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9100M G is positioned at rank 598 and the Radeon HD 3200 is on rank 321, so the Radeon HD 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9100M G

#588
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3919%
#590
3553%
#591
3544%
#595
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3222%
#596
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3200%
#598
GeForce 9100M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
100%
#599
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#600
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
100%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#602
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#603
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#604
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#605
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#606
94%
#607
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#608
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
93%
#611
92%
#612
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3200

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4423%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4249%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4200%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4193%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4184%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4160%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4108%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4093%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4055%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4044%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3995%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3987%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3915%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3912%
#306
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4878%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
94%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
93%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
92%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
85%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
80%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
71%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
68%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
52%
#335
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9100M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3200.

InsightGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9100M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9100M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9100M G and Radeon HD 3200

NVIDIA

GeForce 9100M G

The GeForce 9100M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9100M G scores 83 and the Radeon HD 3200 reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9100M G is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9100M G) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200).

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
G3D Mark Score
83+1%
82
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+113%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9100M G) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3200) — the GeForce 9100M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9100M G) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9100M G) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3200). Decoder: PureVideo VP3 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo VP3
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9100M G draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9100M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9100M G) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
TDP
33W-82%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
2.5+525%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9100M G launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.3 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 8.2 (Radeon HD 3200) — the GeForce 9100M G offers 1.2% better value. The GeForce 9100M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 9100M GRadeon HD 3200
MSRP
$30-40%
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
8.3+1%
8.2
Codename
GM108
Cayman
Release
March 13 2015
December 1 2011
Ranking
#847
#598