
GeForce 9100M G

RADEON X850 XT
GeForce 9100M G vs RADEON X850 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9100M G vs RADEON X850 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9100M G vs RADEON X850 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9100M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $469 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1604.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 165W, a 132W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X850 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X850 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce 9100M G is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X850 XT is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1563.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 165W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9100M G vs RADEON X850 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9100M G
The GeForce 9100M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

RADEON X850 XT
The RADEON X850 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9100M G scores 83 and the RADEON X850 XT reaches 81 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9100M G is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X850 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 2,560 (RADEON X850 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9100M G) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RADEON X850 XT). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83+2% | 81 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+1363% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2581 MHz+119% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9100M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X850 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9100M G has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X850 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce 9100M G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9100M G and 64-bit on the RADEON X850 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9100M G) vs 3 MB (RADEON X850 XT) — the RADEON X850 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9100M G) vs 9.0b (RADEON X850 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9.0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9100M G draws 33W versus the RADEON X850 XT's 165W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 9100M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9100M G) vs 350W (RADEON X850 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 186mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-80% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 186mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+400% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9100M G came in at $30, while the RADEON X850 XT launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce 9100M G was 94% cheaper ($469 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 9100M G) vs 0.2 (RADEON X850 XT) — the GeForce 9100M G offers 1300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X850 XT (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9100M G | RADEON X850 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-94% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8+1300% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 22 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #847 | #103 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














