GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 8350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 130W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 23 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

✅291.3% more average FPS across 23 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌712.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 291.3% in average FPS across 23 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9200 instead at 168 vs 163, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 312.3% (3.4 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200

The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200 scores 168 and the Radeon HD 8350 reaches 163 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score	168+3%	163
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	1024+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+246%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1000 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200 draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 156.2% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 8350
TDP	16W-88%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	10.5+708%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 8350 launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 9200 was 75% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (GeForce 9200) vs 0.8 (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce 9200 offers 325% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 8350
MSRP	$50-75%	$200
Performance per Dollar	3.4+325%	0.8
Codename	GM108	Pitcairn
Release	March 25 2016	March 5 2012
Ranking	#864	#503

Search GeForce 9200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.