GeForce 9300 SE vs GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9300 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce 9100M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300 SE is positioned at rank 668 and the GeForce 9100M G is on rank 598, so the GeForce 9100M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9100M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9100M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300 SE.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9100M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9100M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 SE and GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9300 SE
The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
GeForce 9100M G
The GeForce 9100M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 SE scores 82 and the GeForce 9100M G reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 SE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9100M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 384 (GeForce 9100M G). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9100M G). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 83+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 0.9032 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1176 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9100M G). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300 SE) vs None (GeForce 9100M G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs PureVideo VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 9100M G).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | PureVideo VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 SE draws 33W versus the GeForce 9100M G's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9100M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 9100M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9100M G launched at $30 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 8.3 (GeForce 9100M G) — the GeForce 9100M G offers 1.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $30-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 8.3+1% |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #810 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9300 SE and GeForce 9100M G
