GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon X1650 Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300 SE

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1650 Pro is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (85 vs 82), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9300 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92.9% (1.6 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9300 SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1650 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300 SE

The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 SE scores 82 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 SE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	Radeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score	82	85+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	2581 MHz+174%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	Radeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 SE and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	Radeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 SE draws 33W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 9300 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	Radeon X1650 Pro
TDP	33W-87%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	2.5+733%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 SE came in at $50, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 9300 SE was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP	$50-50%	$100
Performance per Dollar	1.6+100%	0.8
Codename	GM108	Navi 22
Release	March 13 2015	October 17 2023
Ranking	#810	#92

Search GeForce 9300 SE on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.