
GeForce 9300 SE vs GeForce 9300M G

GeForce 9300 SE
Popular choices:

GeForce 9300M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300 SE is positioned at rank 668 and the GeForce 9300M G is on rank 594, so the GeForce 9300M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9300 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 189.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+189.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 SE and GeForce 9300M G

GeForce 9300 SE
The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

GeForce 9300M G
The GeForce 9300M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 SE scores 82 and the GeForce 9300M G reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 SE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M G). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M G). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 549 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 85+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+71% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz+71% | 549 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9300 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300M G has 256 MB. The GeForce 9300 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M G). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300 SE) vs No (GeForce 9300M G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M G).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 SE draws 33W versus the GeForce 9300M G's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9300M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5 | 2.6+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9300M G launched at $30 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9300 SE costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 2.8 (GeForce 9300M G) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 192.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 SE | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $30-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-67% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+193% | 2.8 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #810 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











