GeForce 9300 SE
VS
Radeon HD 2350

GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon HD 2350

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 SE

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300 SE is positioned at rank 668 and the Radeon HD 2350 is on rank 322, so the Radeon HD 2350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE

#656
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6620%
#658
6001%
#659
5985%
#663
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5443%
#664
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5405%
#666
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
100%
#667
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#668
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#669
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
92%
#670
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
92%
#671
91%
#672
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
88%
#673
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
88%
#674
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
87%
#675
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
87%
#676
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
87%
#677
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
84%
#678
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
83%
#679
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#680
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
82%
#681
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4710%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4525%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4473%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4465%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4456%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4431%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4375%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4358%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4318%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4306%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4255%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4245%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4169%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4166%
#307
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5195%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
100%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
99%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
98%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
90%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
85%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
75%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
73%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
55%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
55%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9300 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2350.

InsightGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
Performance
Leading raw performance (+6.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9300 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $48), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 411.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+411.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 SE and Radeon HD 2350

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 SE

The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9300 SE scores 82 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the GeForce 9300 SE leads by 6.5%. The GeForce 9300 SE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
G3D Mark Score
82+6%
77
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+297%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1250 MHz+33%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
112+367%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB. The GeForce 9300 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 2350) — the GeForce 9300 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 SE draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 9300 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
TDP
33W-84%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
2.5+525%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 and now averages $48. The GeForce 9300 SE costs 79.2% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 412.5% better value. The GeForce 9300 SE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 9300 SERadeon HD 2350
MSRP
$50
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$10-79%
$48
Performance per Dollar
8.2+412%
1.6
Codename
GM108
Tahiti
Release
March 13 2015
January 31 2012
Ranking
#810
#454