GeForce 9300 SE vs RADEON X700 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 SE vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 SE vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300 SE

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 286.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 260W, a 227W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X700 PRO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X700 PRO

2023

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
258% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌687.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X700 PRO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300 SE instead at 82 vs 76, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X700 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9300 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 286.3% (1.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9300 SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X700 PRO has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300 SE vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300 SE

The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

RADEON X700 PRO

The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9300 SE scores 82 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce 9300 SE leads by 7.9%. The GeForce 9300 SE is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2245 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
G3D Mark Score	82+8%	76
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	5120+1233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	45.98 TFLOPS+6262%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	2245 MHz+139%
ROPs	8	160+1900%
TMUs	24	320+1233%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	2.5 MB+1216%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300 SE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. GeForce 9300 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 SE and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)+23%	9_0b
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 SE draws 33W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 154.9% difference. The GeForce 9300 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
TDP	33W-87%	260W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	170mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	2.5+733%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 SE came in at $50, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce 9300 SE was 72.1% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (GeForce 9300 SE) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 9300 SE	RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP	$50-72%	$179
Performance per Dollar	1.6+300%	0.4
Codename	GM108	Navi 31
Release	March 13 2015	July 27 2023
Ranking	#810	#29

Search GeForce 9300 SE on Amazon

Search RADEON X700 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.