GeForce 9300M G vs GeForce 6600
GeForce 9300M G
Popular choices:
GeForce 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300M G is positioned at rank 594 and the GeForce 6600 is on rank 362, so the GeForce 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300M G.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 203.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+203.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300M G and GeForce 6600
GeForce 9300M G
The GeForce 9300M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.
GeForce 6600
The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300M G scores 85 and the GeForce 6600 reaches 86 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 6600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 960 (GeForce 6600). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M G) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85 | 86+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 960+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+370% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 1033 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M G) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce 6600) — the GeForce 9300M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6600). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M G) vs No (GeForce 6600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M G) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6600).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300M G draws 33W versus the GeForce 6600's 140W — a 123.7% difference. The GeForce 9300M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M G) vs 350W (GeForce 6600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 183mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-76% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 183mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.6+333% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300M G launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 6600 launched at $270 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6600 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.8 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 8.6 (GeForce 6600) — the GeForce 6600 offers 207.1% better value. The GeForce 9300M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-89% | $270 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 8.6+207% |
| Codename | GM108 | GK106 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #880 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9300M G and GeForce 6600
