
GeForce 930A

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce 930A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 930A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 930A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 930A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅929.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 515.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930A
The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 930A scores 1,241 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1536.7%. The GeForce 930A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930A) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,241 | 20,312+1537% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4864+1167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+2142% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1665 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 8 | 80+900% |
| TMUs | 24 | 152+533% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 4.8 MB+2426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 930A is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930A and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930A) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 930A) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2 (GeForce 930A) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 930A) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930A draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 930A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930A) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 37.6 | 101.6+170% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 930A came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 930A was 62.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 930A) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 513.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 50.9+513% |
| Codename | GM108 | GA104 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #810 | #73 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















