GeForce 930M
VS
Quadro 3000M

GeForce 930M vs Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

2011Core: 450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930M is positioned at rank 153 and the Quadro 3000M is on rank 120, so the Quadro 3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#143
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
322%
#145
292%
#146
291%
#150
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
265%
#151
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
263%
#153
GeForce 930M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 3000M

#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
99%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
99%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
96%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
94%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
87%
#105
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1181%
#120
Quadro 3000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#124
Radeon Pro W5500X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
98%
#125
Quadro T2000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $75
97%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
91%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
89%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
88%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
86%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 930M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 3000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 930MQuadro 3000M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 930M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930M and Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930M scores 1,011 and the Quadro 3000M reaches 1,001 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 3000M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930M) vs 240 (Quadro 3000M). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 930M) vs 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M).

FeatureGeForce 930MQuadro 3000M
G3D Mark Score
1,011
1,001
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
0.432 TFLOPS+2%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 930MQuadro 3000M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 3000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 3000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930M) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 3000M) — the GeForce 930M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 930MQuadro 3000M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930M draws 33W versus the Quadro 3000M's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 930M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930M) vs 350W (Quadro 3000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 930MQuadro 3000M
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
30.6+130%
13.3