GeForce 930M vs Radeon HD 6750

CPU

GPU

GeForce 930M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 930M vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 930M

0.5 GB 33

1,011

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon HD 6750

1 GB 86

1,046

+3.5%

Radeon R7 M360

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

Radeon R9 M280X

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 930M vs Radeon HD 6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 930M vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 930M

2015

Why buy it

✅20.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 86W, a 53W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 930M across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌160.6% higher power demand at 86W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 930M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.4% in average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6750 instead at 1,046 vs 1,011, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 930M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 930M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 930M vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930M

The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930M scores 1,011 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 930M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,046+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	1.008 TFLOPS+139%
Boost Clock	549 MHz	900 MHz+64%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	36+50%
L1 Cache	192 KB+167%	72 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6750 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6750) — the GeForce 930M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 930M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
DirectX	11.0	11.2 (11_0)+2%
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.5+2%	4.4
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 930M) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 930M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
Encoder	NVENC 2.0	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 89.1% difference. The GeForce 930M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
TDP	33W-62%	86W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	30.6+151%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 930M (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 930M	Radeon HD 6750
MSRP	—	$109
Codename	GM108	Juniper
Release	March 13 2015	January 21 2011
Ranking	#880	#872

Search GeForce 930M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.