
GeForce 930M

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
GeForce 930M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 930M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
GeForce 930M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 930M
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2014Why buy it
- ✅36.5% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930M
The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930M scores 1,011 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011+1% | 1,000 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 930M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 930M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 930M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930M draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.6 | 33.3+9% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 930M (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 930M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GM108 | Kaveri Spectre |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 14 2014 |
| Ranking | #880 | #865 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















