GeForce 930MX vs Quadro 2000 D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930MX is positioned at rank 289 and the Quadro 2000 D is on rank 288, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

97%

#279

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

679%

#281

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

616%

#282

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

614%

#286

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

559%

#287

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

555%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

100%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

98%

#296

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

96%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

94%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

94%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

94%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

94%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

100%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

97%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

96%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

95%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

94%

#272

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7137%

#288

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

100%

#289

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#290

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

98%

#293

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

96%

#294

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

95%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

95%

#298

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

94%

#299

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

94%

#301

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

92%

#302

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 930MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 930MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 930MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $35), it costs 29% less, resulting in a 44.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+44.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 930MX Benchmark Check

Quadro 2000 D Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and Quadro 2000 D

GeForce 930MX

The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score	1,278+3%	1,239
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7834 TFLOPS+63%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930MX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000 D) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
Encoder	None	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP6)	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 113.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 178mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Quadro 2000 D
TDP	17W-73%	62W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	178mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	75.2+276%	20.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 930MX launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The GeForce 930MX costs 28.6% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the GeForce 930MX offers 44.4% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).