GeForce 9500M vs Radeon X1600 Pro

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020Core: 1130 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9500M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1600 Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020

Why buy it

  • 1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce 9500M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9500M instead at 104 vs 99, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 Pro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

The GeForce 9500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500M scores 104 versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 99 — the GeForce 9500M leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 9500M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
G3D Mark Score
104+5%
99
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
640
2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
6.39 TFLOPS+389%
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1560 MHz+53%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9500M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9500M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500M) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+23%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9500M) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
Encoder
No NVENC (G84)
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
Avivo
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M draws 75W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 9500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
1.4+100%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon X1600 Pro
MSRP
$149
Codename
GM107
Navi 10
Release
October 27 2015
January 21 2020
Ranking
#671
#216

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.