GeForce 9650M GS vs GeForce 7800 GTX
GeForce 9650M GS
Popular choices:
GeForce 7800 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9650M GS is positioned at rank 680 and the GeForce 7800 GTX is on rank 722, so the GeForce 9650M GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7800 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9650M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7800 GTX.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9650M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9650M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce 7800 GTX
GeForce 9650M GS
The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.
GeForce 7800 GTX
The GeForce 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 268 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 and the GeForce 7800 GTX reaches 268 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the GeForce 7800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 224 (GeForce 7800 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 270 | 268 |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+243% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7800 GTX). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs No (GeForce 7800 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7800 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G84) | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the GeForce 7800 GTX's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 350W (GeForce 7800 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 228mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+400% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9650M GS launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 7800 GTX launched at $599 and now averages $40. The GeForce 9650M GS costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 6.7 (GeForce 7800 GTX) — the GeForce 9650M GS offers 101.5% better value. The GeForce 9650M GS is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-67% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+101% | 6.7 |
| Codename | N13E-GE | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | March 22 2012 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #690 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce 7800 GTX
