GeForce 9650M GS vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce 9650M GS
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 9650M GS is positioned at rank #680 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9650M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7423% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9650M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7423%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7423%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 437.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce 9650M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+437.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce 9650M GS
The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 7423%. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 835 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 270 | 20,312+7423% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 4864+533% |
| Boost Clock | 835 MHz | 1665 MHz+99% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9650M GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G84) | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0 | 101.6+1029% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9650M GS launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce 9650M GS costs 92.9% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 437% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GS | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-93% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 72.5+437% |
| Codename | N13E-GE | GA104 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #690 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
