GeForce 9650M GS vs RADEON HD6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GS vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9650M GS vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GS

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
468.6% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅37.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $164 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 790.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD6410D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 56.7% in PassMark G3D (423 vs 270), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $164 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 790.8% (12.1 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9650M GS vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9650M GS

The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 56.7%. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 835 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	270	423+57%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	768+500%	128
Boost Clock	835 MHz	2200 MHz+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD6410D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GS and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	30W	15W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.0	28.2+213%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GS came in at $199, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 82.4% cheaper ($164 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 764.3% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	RADEON HD6410D
MSRP	$199	$35-82%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	12.1+764%
Codename	N13E-GE	Dragon Range
Release	March 22 2012	January 3 2023
Ranking	#690	#843

Search GeForce 9650M GS on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6410D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.