GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

2012Core: 790 MHzBoost: 835 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GS

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-7480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 468.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 19.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

  • 170.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $164 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1367.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 170.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 158.1% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 270), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9650M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $164 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1367.8% (19.9 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9650M GS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 697 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 158.1%. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 835 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score
270
697+158%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
2304+200%
Boost Clock
835 MHz
1266 MHz+52%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon R5 A6-7480
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
9.0+96%
4.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GS came in at $199, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A6-7480 was 82.4% cheaper ($164 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 1321.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 A6-7480 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP
$199
$35-82%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
19.9+1321%
Codename
N13E-GE
Ellesmere
Release
March 22 2012
June 29 2016
Ranking
#690
#305

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.