CPU
GPU
GeForce 9650M GT
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9650M GT is positioned at rank 679 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is on rank 593, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GT
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9650M GT.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 70.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+70.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9650M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 140+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+17% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G96) | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3650's 50W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8 | 2.8+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 9.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers 69.1% better value. The GeForce 9650M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 9.3+69% |
| Codename | GM107 | Broadway |
| Release | October 27 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #671 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9650M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
