Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GT

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

2010Core: 700 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 9650M GT
1 GB 75
137
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 7350 LE
brand logoGeForce 8600M GS
brand logoGeForce Go 6800
brand logoGeForce 9300M GS
brand logoGeForce GTX 1630
brand logoGeForce GTX 970
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
1 GB 50
140
+2.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 2350
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3470
brand logoRadeon HD 6290
brand logoRadeon HD 4250
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GT

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 108.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (140 vs 137), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9650M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 108.6% (2.9 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9650M GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GT

The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650).

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
G3D Mark Score
137
140+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
800+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+17%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+300%
80 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GT and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3650. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+10%
10.1
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
Encoder
No NVENC (G96)
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3650's 50W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
—
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
—
Perf/Watt
1.8
2.8+56%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GT came in at $100, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3650 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GT (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 9650M GTMobility Radeon HD 3650
MSRP
$100
$49-51%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
2.9+107%
Codename
GM107
Broadway
Release
October 27 2015
January 7 2010
Ranking
#671
#846
Search GeForce 9650M GT on AmazonSearch Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.