GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 5450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 5450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 5450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GT

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 151W, a 76W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5450

2009

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌101.3% higher power demand at 151W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9650M GT instead at 137 vs 136, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9650M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65.5% (2.3 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9650M GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 5450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9650M GT

The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

Radeon HD 5450

The Radeon HD 5450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the Radeon HD 5450 reaches 136 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5450 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 5450). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5450).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
G3D Mark Score	137	136
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640	1440+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS	2.088 TFLOPS+60%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	72+80%
L1 Cache	320 KB+122%	144 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5450 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5450. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5450) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5450).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
Encoder	No NVENC (G96)	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5450's 151W — a 67.3% difference. The GeForce 9650M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5450). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
TDP	75W-50%	151W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.8+100%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 5450 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5450 was 40% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 2.3 (Radeon HD 5450) — the Radeon HD 5450 offers 64.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GT (2015 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GT	Radeon HD 5450
MSRP	$100	$60-40%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	2.3+64%
Codename	GM107	Cypress
Release	October 27 2015	September 30 2009
Ranking	#671	#682

Search GeForce 9650M GT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.