
GeForce 9650M GT

Radeon HD 8180
GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 8180 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 8180 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9650M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8180
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9650M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon HD 8180 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

Radeon HD 8180
The Radeon HD 8180 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the Radeon HD 8180 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8180 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8180). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8180). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Radeon HD 8180 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137+1% | 135 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+32% | 0.992 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+32% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9650M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8180 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Radeon HD 8180 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8180 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9650M GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8180. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8180) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Radeon HD 8180 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8180's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8180 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8180). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Radeon HD 8180 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8 | 2.7+50% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9650M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 8180 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8180 was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 4.5 (Radeon HD 8180) — the Radeon HD 8180 offers 221.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GT (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Radeon HD 8180 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 4.5+221% |
| Codename | GM107 | Venus |
| Release | October 27 2015 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #671 | #745 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














