GeForce 9650M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9650M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9650M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137+1% | 135 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+48% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9650M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9650M GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GT and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4330. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs UVD2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G96) | UVD2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4330's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8 | 4.5+150% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9650M GT came in at $100, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4330 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 2.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GT (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 2.8+100% |
| Codename | GM107 | M98 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #671 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9650M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 4330
