
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs GRID V100-8Q

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Popular choices:

GRID V100-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is positioned at rank #377 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID V100-8Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 53025% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53025%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and GRID V100-8Q

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $249.

GRID V100-8Q
The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra scores 17 versus the GRID V100-8Q's 16 — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra leads by 6.3%. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GRID V100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 640 (GRID V100-8Q). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17+6% | 16 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.263 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+32% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+60% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GRID V100-8Q has 512 MB. The GRID V100-8Q offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra draws 160W versus the GRID V100-8Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 350W (GRID V100-8Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID V100-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra costs 99.8% less ($9980 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers 100+% better value. The GRID V100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-98% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-100% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GF114 | GM107 |
| Release | January 25 2011 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #580 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















