GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1323.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌158.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 62W.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 160W, a 98W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1407.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.9% in PassMark G3D (18 vs 17), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,801 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1323.8% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 2000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $249.

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra scores 17 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 — the Quadro FX 2000 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).

Feature	GeForce FX 5600 Ultra	Quadro FX 2000
G3D Mark Score	17	18+6%
Architecture	Rankine	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.263 TFLOPS+163%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5600 Ultra	Quadro FX 2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5600 Ultra	Quadro FX 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra draws 160W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W — a 88.3% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce FX 5600 Ultra	Quadro FX 2000
TDP	160W	62W-61%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	190mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.3+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra came in at $199, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5600 Ultra was 93.4% cheaper ($2801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5600 Ultra	Quadro FX 2000
MSRP	$199-93%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	GF114	GF106
Release	January 25 2011	December 24 2010
Ranking	#580	#902

Search GeForce FX 5600 Ultra on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.