GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
VS
RADEON XPRESS 200M

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

2011Core: 823 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is positioned at rank 377 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
80600%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
77433%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
76533%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76400%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76244%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
75811%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
74856%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
74578%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
73889%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
73689%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
72800%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
72644%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
71333%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
71289%
#362
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
88889%
#377
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#378
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#380
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#381
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#382
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
33%
#383
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
33%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
22%
#385
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
22%
#386
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
22%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#388
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#389
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
22%
#390
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
11%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
96%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
94%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
91%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
91%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
89%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
82%
#101
79%
#210
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3212%
#225
RADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
99%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
98%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
94%
#238
FirePro 3D V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
80%
#240
Quadro K600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 35.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra.

InsightGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-35.3%)
Leading raw performance (+35.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and RADEON XPRESS 200M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra scores 17 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 35.3%. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score
17
23+35%
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.263 TFLOPS
5.274 TFLOPS+318%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
160+150%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M has 512 MB. The RADEON XPRESS 200M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX
9.0a
9_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra draws 160W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
TDP
160W
50W-69%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
190mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.5+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5600 UltraRADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
GF114
Navi 12
Release
January 25 2011
June 15 2020
Ranking
#580
#283