
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

RADEON XPRESS 200M
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17 vs 23).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
RADEON XPRESS 200M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+35.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON XPRESS 200M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $249.

RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra scores 17 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 35.3%. The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17 | 23+35% |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.263 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS+318% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON XPRESS 200M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. RADEON XPRESS 200M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra draws 160W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 190mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.5+400% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON XPRESS 200M (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GF114 | Navi 12 |
| Release | January 25 2011 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #580 | #283 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














