
GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce 6100

GeForce FX 5900ZT
Popular choices:

GeForce 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce 6100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5900ZT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5900ZT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 22.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+22.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-22.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5900ZT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900ZT and GeForce 6100

GeForce FX 5900ZT
The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce 6100
The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900ZT scores 33 versus the GeForce 6100's 27 — the GeForce FX 5900ZT leads by 22.2%. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is built on Rankine while the GeForce 6100 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 384 (GeForce 6100). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33+22% | 27 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+10% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+614% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5900ZT comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6100 has 512 MB. The GeForce 6100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6100). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs No (GeForce 6100). Decoder: None vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6100).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5900ZT draws 365W versus the GeForce 6100's 30W — a 169.6% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 350W (GeForce 6100). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 218mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 30W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 218mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.9+800% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5900ZT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs Infinity (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 offers NaN% better value. The GeForce 6100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | GP108 |
| Release | March 24 2011 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #555 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











