GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce FX Go 5200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is positioned at rank #350 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 156587.5% higher G3D Mark score and 25706.5% more VRAM (8 GB vs 32 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go 5200.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-156587.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+156587.5%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go 5200 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce FX Go 5200
The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 156587.5%. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 680 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 12,535+156588% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+750% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1052% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+35% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+752% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+750% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+750% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX Go 5200 comes with 32 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 25706.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce FX Go 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.031 GB | 8 GB+25706% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 126.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 130W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 66°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX Go 5200 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $209 |
| Codename | GB202 | GA106 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #3 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go 5200 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
